• i_need_your_bones@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Its more like going to the rapist who took the rape baby after the rape and saying that they really shouldn’t have raped that person and though the issue with stealing the rape baby is bad a good solution would have been to not rape.

    If America didn’t invade, no orphans. Really weird you’de equate not invading Vietnam with raping a person

    Edit: to clarify, no, the other person didn’t say “just don’t get raped” or the equivalent. The analogy was wrong. This is my point

    • jaaake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      28 days ago

      A solution to a problem can’t be “travel back in time and prevent yourself from being in this situation” that’s not a solution, it’s pointing out the obvious source of the problem.

      • i_need_your_bones@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        I agree, but that person did not say “just don’t get raped.” The analogy doesn’t work, and is weird to say while being destructive to the conversation.

        That comment I replied to made this equivalancy which is table flipping, fuck you I’m going to paint you in the worst light, type behavior.

        No, the guy didn’t say “just don’t get raped” he said “we shouldn’t have been raping”

        Ok, solution wasn’t the proper word, the commenter was talking morality. Taking the babies was wrong and America shouldn’t have done it, nor should they have gotten involved afterwards.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      28 days ago

      Vietnam was at war before the USA got involved, it would have just been a one sided slaughter by the North.