Only because he sold it as Bitcoin. As long as there is a direct trail to money lost for a company, otherwise I doubt the court would have made such a consideration. This was the second court case regarding it, so the lawyers and the court are definitely making plenty of their salary off of it.
Only because he sold it as Bitcoin. As long as there is a direct trail to money lost for a company, otherwise I doubt the court would have made such a consideration. This was the second court case regarding it, so the lawyers and the court are definitely making plenty of their salary off of it.