• Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    300 people working on hardware, 300 people working on software, 300 people working on various smaller aspects like basic research, marketing, quality testing, etc., and 100 people in associated staff like managers, hr, janitorial, administrators, etc.

    Seems reasonable to me.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think that’s reasonable. 300 people full time to release 4 headsets in the last ten years? 300 people to build a custom Android version and a shitty VR chat clone?

      • Beacon@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You may not think it’s reasonable, but the evidence suggests that it is. If 100 people could do it then the market would be flooded with high quality standalone vr headset systems.

          • Beacon@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Valve’s system isn’t standalone, and wasn’t trying to create a whole new vr platform like fb was trying to do

            • hperrin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Yes, it is, and yes, they did. It can run PC games standalone, and Steam VR on SteamOS is a platform they created.

              (I’m talking about the Steam Frame, not the Valve Index.)