Looks like the Ghostrunner developers also have an issue with paid mods running off their IP.

  • iamthetot@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand intellectual property

    I’m asking from a place of curiosity, not a place of judgement. Have you ever created anything? A piece of art, poem or prose, a film, a program, etc?

    • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am an artist who is VERY anti-IP law. The system as it exists is evil and does far more harm than good. IP is not some holy grail that deserves protection when it can be so easily abused. I would rather have no IP law than the current system, but I’ll settle for reforms.

      • Vespair@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I agree with this.

        That said, the prohibition of paid mods should be a cultural matter, not a legal one. It shouldn’t be illegal, but we as a gaming community should refuse to engage with them as poor practice

        • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It’s part of an overall system that protects the Haves from the Have-Nots. I consider it evil.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In sim racing, Assetto Corsa has tons of paid mods, and simultaneously its developer is one of very few profitable companies. How come Kunos aren’t bankrupt from paid mods existing?

    • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Copyright makes no sense. As long as there is a correct citation, it’s kosher as far as I’m concerned.

      “This song was originally created by @turdnugget” should be the point of copyright and not the current rent seeking behaviour of the ruling class.

      • Thymos@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So, what if I wrote a book and got it published, but it didn’t sell well. Some big company copies it, puts a lot of effort in promoting it and it becomes a bestseller. I don’t get any of the money for it, but they cite me as the original author. How is that fair?

            • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
              link
              fedilink
              Français
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You did not describe a copyrightless world, you described academic publishing. On that note, fortunately open access allows the have nots to acquire the same knowledge of the haves. Elabakyan showed how good it could be but the copyright barons had to ruin it for everybody. Furthermore, removal of copyright would curtail the elite’s ability to impose a message on the proletariat.

        • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Plenty of music, still think copyright is stupid.

          Attribution, 100%, copyright itself is stupid.

          Now I extend the same question to you.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                I think that’s the easy bit. For me at least.

                Any sort of artwork is expensive to commission though. And if you’re born without a shred of artistic talent in your entire being, you ain’t doing it yourself.

                So I’ve got some very broad strokes vision of a game I want to build and I haven’t expanded on it further because I know I can’t afford to make it.

                If I do decide to make it, I’d have to hire someone to do 3D modelling* at the very least. I don’t see a world where that’s feasible without copyright, because then I’d just be paying someone’s salary (or commissions) and be out of pocket for it.

                * No, don’t worry, I’m not thinking of yet another photorealistic-ish looking 3D game. More like something in the style of the 3D Zelda games or like some of the (MMO)RPGs of the 00s.

              • iamthetot@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, I’d like to do that myself. Mostly need the time and sufficient motivation. Most of my time is eaten up GMing multiple ttrpgs a week right now.

        • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I have no idea what your question is getting at. I am a published artist but I pay my bills with unrelated W-2 work

          • iamthetot@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I said from the get go that I was asking from a place of curiosity not judgement. I wasn’t “getting at” anything. It interests me to know what your stance is and how it might be informed. Congrats on being published, that’s pretty cool.