• anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is fine under section 230.

    Be careful, we don’t want to get rid of section 230.

    Best thing to do is get as many people off meta sites as possible.

      • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        People still use meta shit and twitter. My fellow american citizens are too fucking dumb to know how to protest. However this excludes black woman though. Target will never recover.

        • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I think it’s less that theyre stupid and more that it’s literally been designed to be an addiction machine. And the average person isn’t consuming media from other sources because at one point, things posted on the addiction machine came from multiple sources. They just missed the subtle changes over time. It’s by design and it’s evil.

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is fine regardless of section 230, no law generally prohibits any removal of information you’re hosting. In USA that rule only means that talking some actions of removal doesn’t incur liability for that which you failed to remove.