is computationally prohibitive
Imagemagick would do that in a snap.
I think I see diaspora on there… … way up in the top right corner.
Where is wikipedia 😭
Big yikes
sad ass graph
Is it just me or the lack of “adult entertainment” websites makes it look like this diagram is deeply incomplete?
Well then they’d be a massive block being “Genitals”
I feel like there are natural, err, limits to how long one can spend on those sites, surely?
you’d be suprised
I wonder what the data covers. Does it show only genuine browser traffic or also apps? Do apps that periodically phone home for updates, like mail apps, count towards the ‘attention’? Is that why gmail is so massive?
I think it also might be USA centric
If I open a tab for gmail and leave it for 24 hours, is that 24 hours worth of ‘activity’?
Better yet, if you are having the gmail app installed, is the app checking in the background counted as activity? Might explain Facebook’s share. Mark ‘Zuccy the Zucc’ Zuckerberg famously gets pinged every time a Facebook user’s heart beats.
I would also like to know this. I’ve gotten rid of my streaming services and social media (minus the fediverse), but I don’t see how people spend more time on Facebook than on Netflix. I have wasted entire weekends binge watching TV.
Yahoo mail? Seriously?
volunteered to do the paper forms for highschool signups at the start of the year last year. Nearly 100% of the kids had a Gmail address but the parents had around ~60% Gmail ~30% Hotmail and ~10% yahoo.
Now do it based on the company that owns the sites
https://techxplore.com/news/2026-07-desktop-browsing-trends-gmail.html
Which links to: https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=6991638
Desktop browsing, u.s. residents.
as I expected, undisclosed USA centric study
AOL!?
Old people set their homepage and never looked back.
And never turn off the monitor
Also, Verizon’s email service was provided by AOL up until a couple of years ago. Or at least the shambling husk that called itself AOL, whichever entity that ultimately may have been.
The whole fediverse is somewhere down in the fog. Maybe someday it will BE the fog.
what cracks me up is I will often mention the importance of email and I get flak for it like being old and going away and that is not where people do stuff today and its going away or such. Looks to me like its the largest general thing up there. 25% of the named blocks and I would not be surprised if its a higher percentage of the unnamed ones.
What evil creepy browser extensions and cookies did they have to trick unsuspecting users into installing in order to collect this data?
You might be surprised to learn that nearly all sites collect this data by default. It’s built into the standard analytics package of most hosted WordPress services, Cloudflare, Google, etc.
A simple JS script can collect your system and browser info, generalized location, exactly where your mouse is and for how long (which links you hovered over but didn’t click, how you found menus and submenus, etc.), which search engine you used to get to the site, how long you stayed on each page, and so much more.
You need a browser extension to not provide this data, even on Firefox. I always recommend uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger. The two together generally do a good job of blocking most of these scripts.
Source: I’m a web developer
Twitter gets less attention than Yahoo Mail ?
Unfortunately, I don’t have the data close at hand, but Twitter is actually not used by that many people online. You’d be surprised given the huge amount of proliferation that Twitter screenshots get, but honestly, I think that might just be a psyop, or I’m just paranoid.
It’s definitely punching above its weight class, that’s for sure.
