But for every lustful post killed by a legal threat, another 10 take its place.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    4 days ago

    This media has been disabled in response to a report by the copyright owner

    Other Bluesky furry accounts have accused Kiwibank of censoring sexy sheep art that wasn’t even connected to Buck in any way, essentially making their work collateral damage in a war over a reputably fuckable farm animal from New Zealand.

    The DMCA is out of control

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Spinoff has seen several of the takedown requests, which were issued under the American Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). They were sent out by Christopher Young, a partner at the prominent law firm MinterEllisonRuddWatts who specialises in intellectual property law. The notice viewed by The Spinoff accuses 10 accounts, including @jestermaxxing, of having “taken Kiwibank’s distinctive Buck image and used it to make highly sexualised and inappropriate copies which infringe the Kiwibank copyright”. X appears to have complied with the complaint.

        DMCA takedowns are valid regardless of what country they come from I think, and both Twitter and Bluesky are based in the US