blinfabian@feddit.nl to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoreboot NOWfeddit.nlimagemessage-square71linkfedilinkarrow-up1230arrow-down150
arrow-up1180arrow-down1imagereboot NOWfeddit.nlblinfabian@feddit.nl to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square71linkfedilink
minus-squareesc@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoArch package manager isn’t really simplistic? Maintainers can mitigate this easily, just goes counter arch philosophy.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 hours agoThey’ve been bolting on more complex use cases, but keeping packaging simplistic was their stated goal 20 years ago It’s not a bad thing, but missing modules for the running kernel on updates is one edge case new users might not expect
minus-squareesc@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoReboot is a recommended choice on any linux system after kernel upgrade (systemd as well). It’s not a simple package manager and it can do a lot, not on the level of zypper but it’s pretty complete. There are some intentional limitations, true.
Arch package manager isn’t really simplistic? Maintainers can mitigate this easily, just goes counter arch philosophy.
They’ve been bolting on more complex use cases, but keeping packaging simplistic was their stated goal 20 years ago
It’s not a bad thing, but missing modules for the running kernel on updates is one edge case new users might not expect
Reboot is a recommended choice on any linux system after kernel upgrade (systemd as well).
It’s not a simple package manager and it can do a lot, not on the level of zypper but it’s pretty complete. There are some intentional limitations, true.