How many times have I, and the rest of the Internet, talked about the environmental impact? The mental faculty drain? The misinformation? The use of media without permission?
Don’t pretend to be ignorant of the glasses of AI, you’re grasping at straws.
A pathetic squirming, an attempt to validate your own repulsive and pathetic actions.
I tesponded to each of those reasons and countered them easily. AI is no different than all the other late stage capitalism products that extract money and value from everything they can with no concern for anything else. I’m not saying it is great, I am saying it is just like everything else. In some cases it is less damaging than other things we already have/do like burn oil.
False equivalence fallacy. Just because two things are bad doesn’t mean they are equally bad. You want to “easily counter” any of my points? Prove them incorrect with facts.
You’ll probably have to get a robot to do the thinking for you so have fun with that.
I didn’t say equally bad. I said AI is actually less bad then things like bruning oil.
I also said the impact of my use of AI is outweighed by one airline flight.
You have yet to even respond to my points because you know they are correct. While I have countered nearly all of yours. So maybe you really need a robot to think for you, cause you clearly can’t think on your own.
Bruv I’ve given multiple reasons why ai sucks this entire conversation, it’s not my fault you got holes in your memory.
Maybe it’s because you offload your thinking? Hm.
Sure you did. Here’s a banger:
“It’s just, you know, ai sucks and everyone knows it”
That is a reason alright. But not in any meaningful way.
How many times have I, and the rest of the Internet, talked about the environmental impact? The mental faculty drain? The misinformation? The use of media without permission?
Don’t pretend to be ignorant of the glasses of AI, you’re grasping at straws.
A pathetic squirming, an attempt to validate your own repulsive and pathetic actions.
I tesponded to each of those reasons and countered them easily. AI is no different than all the other late stage capitalism products that extract money and value from everything they can with no concern for anything else. I’m not saying it is great, I am saying it is just like everything else. In some cases it is less damaging than other things we already have/do like burn oil.
False equivalence fallacy. Just because two things are bad doesn’t mean they are equally bad. You want to “easily counter” any of my points? Prove them incorrect with facts.
You’ll probably have to get a robot to do the thinking for you so have fun with that.
I didn’t say equally bad. I said AI is actually less bad then things like bruning oil. I also said the impact of my use of AI is outweighed by one airline flight. You have yet to even respond to my points because you know they are correct. While I have countered nearly all of yours. So maybe you really need a robot to think for you, cause you clearly can’t think on your own.