New TOS basically say Meta can scrape all your stuff.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If anyone is still on Facebook, fuck them. They deserve all of this shit.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Holy shit! I thought this just applied to Whatsapp, but, no, it’s is literally all your stuff anywhere on the web:

    The terms, which apply to business users on Facebook, Instagram, and other Meta properties, include a new paragraph that authorizes Meta to scrape any web pages associated with the user’s products or services, as well as content available through those pages. Meta says it can then use that data for product development or training of AI models.

    The only question isn’t how broadly or specifically the provisions in the new agreement will be interpreted but where are businesses going to move to? because this is absolutely a red line for any creative business.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      That does not seem legally binding to me at all. At least it‘s in no way plausible that using one service could grand them ownership of your private information or intellectual properties anywhere on the web. I mean I am no lawyer but this is just asking to get sued big time on Meta‘s part.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There is nothing plausible about our laws in the US. Our court precedents are often in open contempt of the Constitution and our laws in service of the rich.

        The courts were captured via the federalist society, decades back and it’s getting worse. Part of the terms are that you can’t sue and instead can only use binding arbitration of their choosing, the supreme court officially blessed this, formerly illegal, maybe ten or so years back.

        Edit: Wording for clarity

    • chewypoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly, any “creative business” that still does business through Mark Zuckerberg should have corrected themselves years ago. The next best time is today.

      With these new terms, any creative business left on Facebook and IG needs to be called out for agreeing to Meta’s terms. This is the line artists can’t pass. Staying on Meta is scab behavior.

      Doing business with Meta at all should be a reputational liability.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Since previous TOS allow them to change the TOS at any time without warning, does that mean an abandoned, or account put on hold, automatically is made to agree to this?

    This kind of stuff only was allowed by the courts in the last couple decades plus. In the Bush years. Courts used to throw out entire contracts for one illegal part, now they legalized those things and allow the rest to remain in place if part is illegal.

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, they declare they’re doing it in the ToS but bury it so virtually nobody actually sees it and knows about it.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The one where AI has no liability framework, which means no organization can be blamed for anything?

          It’s an unstable state. Meta can survive the AI bubble collapsing, they’ll even be in a good position afterwards since most of their rivals have put their necks out for AI

          And when the bubble collapses, there’s going to be a bunch of regulation pushed to soothe the public anger and no more mountains of money to block it

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            there’s going to be a bunch of regulation pushed to soothe the public anger

            I mean they clearly couldn’t give a single fuck about “public anger”?

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              They do when it includes the portion of the public with money.

              And a lot of money is going to be lost, including rich people’s money. And that’s something that leads to consequences

              • artyom@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                How old are you? Do you not remember the 2008 financial crisis? Bankers committed fraud to the extent of causing a global financial crisis and recession. Who saw consequences for that? No one. The government just rewarded them with a bailout.

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  19 minutes ago

                  Yeah, because rich people didn’t lose money. I was there, I distinctly remember how they actually made massive profits while the rest of us suffered

                  There’s not enough money to bail out this bubble, it’s exponentially bigger. No one is going to buy $40 trillion of US bonds anytime soon, either we print money, and the rich lose through massive inflation, or we let nature take it’s course and the rich end up holding part of the bag

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So they can officially use the information they already collected for commercial purposes.