You have the “1D” political compass of left vs right, but those terms are so broad they can describe completely opposite viewpoints. Then there’s the “2D” political compass with authoritarian/libertarian and the classic left/right, but that is still quite broad and doesn’t fit every ideology and belief well. If someone were to create a fully fleshed out N-dimensional political compass that could accurately summarise generalise to a reasonable degree of accuracy* a person’s political perspective, how many axes are needed, and what would they be?
Of the top of my head, I can think of a few:
- authoritarian vs anti-authoritarian (on the extremes, you would have dictator bootlickers who support a one-rules-all style system and anarchists advocating for no authority at all)
- internationalism vs nationalism
- egalitarianism vs traditionalism (social equality vs hierarchal society)
- environmentalist vs anti-environmentalist (every policy must consider environmental impacts vs cLiMaTe ChAnGe Is A hOaX)
- progressive vs conservative (or pro-change vs anti-change)
- intellectualism vs anti-intellectualism (pro-science vs anti-science)
- free vs regulated economy (on the extremes, no government influence of the economy at all and a state-run economy)
Please don’t treat this as an argument over why your politics are better! Debating politics is the worst kind of internet argument one can consume themselves into…
Also, please note that this post is not intended to attack anyone with the above viewpoints. Just want to make that clear.
If you don’t want an economy (money) to balance resources, how would you do it?
Based on need. Money (broadly) doesn’t do a great job at balancing resources, and while based on needs gets difficult when resources are scarce, America (at least) relies on overproduction anyway, so we do have the resources in a lot of key areas. Enough food is thrown away to feed all of the hungry, we have more empty homes than homeless people, unused clothing is thrown away end masse, etc etc, without even getting into how a lot of things are designed to be disposable that really don’t need to be.
Not the person you asked, but any need/want. Like, in a post scarcity world there could be a central bank where the robots contribute resources and people request them as needed/desired. No money needed.