• schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    The damage can be caused quite unintentionally as the AI single-mindedly pursues its goal; sentience is not required.

    See the paperclip thought experiment.

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The paperclip scenario requires an AI capable of reasoning - LLMs are nowhere near that.

      • weps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        LLM’s don’t operate in a vacuum anymore. They’re given tools and access to systems.

        An LLM could for sure shut down a database if you ask it to reduce costs and you give it database management tools. That’s getting closer to the paperclip situation.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately, we’ve written a lot about the paperclip scenario, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was in the training data

        • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          …still not how this works. The model itself would need reasoning capability. The ability to regurgitate the story does not make it capable of taking the necessary actions.

            • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Find me an example of a system that can translate “make this steel mill produce paperclips” into actions. I’ll wait.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                A computer automated system doesn’t currently exist, obviously. That would be reckless and pointless, so thankfully, nobody’s seen a reason to implement it.

                I just know techbros and similar will want to build and connect LLMs to systems like that as soon as they think they can get away with it.