• jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Zuck has kissed the ring. He will be fine. You can all stop worrying about him now. Barbecue sauce.

  • TheFederatedPipe@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It really is! I was off for about three months, and I decided to go back to it just to be up-to-date with some friends and creators, right? Well, I was doom-scrolling for hours in about just a week of usage. Whenever that happens, I uninstall the app causing it, so I just deleted it again. The craziest part? After a couple of hours, I could feel the craving to open the app. Crazy shit.

    • SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I use instaDM. I am not able to see what other people post unless I go to their profile, but default won’t show it anyway most of the time as it will mainly give short content videos so I just removed the feed altogether

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Fuck Facebook and also this is clearly morphing into a moral panic about social media in a way that is extremely unproductive, dangerous and ultimately a distraction from the actual issues at hand.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Billionaires are running the most popular social media sites and utilizing the algorithm to attempt to influence their addicted userbase on a large scale, and succeeded on many demographics and even win elections.

      I don’t think it is a stretch to call it a moral panic, because its not an unbiased and transparent system that is dictating what is seen and spread. It is a huge black box propganda tool.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Except the propaganda mostly isn’t what the “social media addiction” folks are worrying about.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Even people who don’t care about usage of propaganda are affected, since these social media addicted folks have brought up how they are getting more unrelated propaganda content exposed to them even if all they want to see is cats and food recipes as an example.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not sure if you’re trying to argue that modern social media is a good thing… Because it really isn’t. All of these platforms are actively detrimental to our mental health and destabilizing society. All of them have their billionaire owners manipulating the algorithms to maximize what they want you to see and minimize opposing views, if not outright removing them (like Meta is doing with the ICE List currently).

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Massive corporate social media companies and rightwing billionaires are the problem, not social media.

        Not sure if you’re trying to argue that modern social media is a good thing… Because it really isn’t.

        What are you doing here then?

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity, and are designed algorithmically to keep you engaged as long as possible while pressuring you to share more and more of your personal life.

          The “If social media bad, why on Lemmy?” Thing is the epitome of halfwit false equivalency.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity, and are designed algorithmically to keep you engaged as long as possible while pressuring you to share more and more of your personal life.

            then use your brain and analyze this deeper than social media = bad

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Nobody is interested in seriously engaging with your sophomoric “you criticize society yet you participate in it” nonsense. We get it, you’re 14 and think you’re deep.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        news networks have been doing this same pretty much since they’ve existed

        • RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No, news networks are not algorithmically curating content specifically for each individual person, based on personal traits that they record based on usage.

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Humans have been killing each other as long as we’ve existed isn’t an argument to avoid trying to make it happen less

          • IronBird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            just saying billionaires manipulating shit has been the norm for ages, which is why we used to have media-ownership limits…repealed under Clinton iirc

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      nah… mark is clearly an international drug dealer and needs to have all his property seized, and then destroyed while he rots in prison.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    pondered letting “tweens” access a private mode inspired by the popularity of fake Instagram accounts teens know as “finstas.” That document included an “internal discussion on how to counter the narrative that Facebook is bad for youth and admission that internal data shows that Facebook use is correlated with lower well-being (although it says the effect reverses longitudinally).” Other allegedly damning documents showed Meta seemingly bragging that “teens can’t switch off from Instagram even if they want to” and an employee declaring, “oh my gosh yall IG is a drug,” likening all social media platforms to “pushers.” Similarly, a 2020 Google document detailed the company’s plan to keep kids engaged “for life,” despite internal research showing young YouTube users were more likely to “disproportionately” suffer from “habitual heavy use, late night use, and unintentional use” deteriorating their “digital well-being.” Shorts, YouTube’s feature that rivals TikTok, also is a concern for parents suing, and three years later, documents showed Google choosing to target teens with Shorts, despite research flagging that the “two biggest challenges for teen wellbeing on YouTube” were prominently linked to watching shorts. Those challenges included Shorts bombarding teens with “low quality content recommendations that can convey & normalize unhealthy beliefs or behaviors” and teens reporting that “prolonged unintentional use” was “displacing valuable activities like time with friends or sleep.”