The FBI has been unable to access a Washington Post reporter’s seized iPhone because it was in Lockdown Mode, a sometimes overlooked feature that makes iPhones broadly more secure, according to recently filed court records.

The court record shows what devices and data the FBI was able to ultimately access, and which devices it could not, after raiding the home of the reporter, Hannah Natanson, in January as part of an investigation into leaks of classified information. It also provides rare insight into the apparent effectiveness of Lockdown Mode, or at least how effective it might be before the FBI may try other techniques to access the device.

“Because the iPhone was in Lockdown mode, CART could not extract that device,” the court record reads, referring to the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team, a unit focused on performing forensic analyses of seized devices. The document is written by the government, and is opposing the return of Natanson’s devices.

Archive: http://archive.today/gfTg9

  • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Safely using an insecure device swiftly becomes a hobby, unless you give in to the default experience.

    I installed GrapheneOS, installed my apps, and I’m done. If I want to deny telemetry or to set up something like the duress password, it’s one to two taps.

    iPhone users, man… stop drinking the fucking punch.

    • Lyubo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Nowaday is not just iPhone users. Every major company fucks the consumers over and people defend them like it’s their own company. I don’t get it.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m not an iPhone user. I don’t own an Apple anything and really despise them as a company. Stop making stupid assumptions.