Wrong. Assuming 6bit encoding and one bit per minute; a 3 char start and stop sequence. 1024 character message could be sent per 4.3 days. Or a faster response time than my ex.
You can’t send bits at a constant rate in this case. You essentialy get to send one very large number, the amount of time since your decided starting time (plus the one bit we were actually intended to use). The bit count grows logarithmicly with time
Thus, the amount of bits n you can send over t time steps would be
n = log(t)/log(2) + 1
As an example, say they wait 8 seconds before sending you a 1. You have received the number 1000 and the bit 1. That’s a total of 5 bits.
If they choose to wait twice as long, 16 seconds, they have in effect transmitted the numbers 10000 and one additional bit, a total of 6 bits. Double the time but only one additional bit.
Wrong. Assuming 6bit encoding and one bit per minute; a 3 char start and stop sequence. 1024 character message could be sent per 4.3 days. Or a faster response time than my ex.
You can’t send bits at a constant rate in this case. You essentialy get to send one very large number, the amount of time since your decided starting time (plus the one bit we were actually intended to use). The bit count grows logarithmicly with time
Thus, the amount of bits n you can send over t time steps would be
As an example, say they wait 8 seconds before sending you a 1. You have received the number 1000 and the bit 1. That’s a total of 5 bits.
If they choose to wait twice as long, 16 seconds, they have in effect transmitted the numbers 10000 and one additional bit, a total of 6 bits. Double the time but only one additional bit.