• Hoimo@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There’s one more big difference between Windows and Linux: Windows can only install updates while shutting down, for some reason. On Linux I boot the machine, see the notification for updates, and run them in the background while I do my own things. If the updates need a reboot to take effect, it’s a normal reboot that takes mere seconds.

    On Windows, I get an update notification in the morning and either take 5 minutes to restart right then, or wait until I naturally shut down (end of the day) and have an abnormally long shutdown that (sometimes) leaves my laptop running and still not fully updated while it’s in my bag. That isn’t a security issue or a policy issue, it’s a technical limitation that results in a terrible user experience.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Windows can only install updates while shutting down, for some reason.

      That information is out-dated. Hotpatching was introduced in Windows 11 24H2

    • oasis@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Doesn’t Linux require Kernel updates quite often though? Pretty sure those require a reboot.

      Sure rebooting is annoying but you only have to do it 12 times a year so it really doesn’t matter that much unless you computer runs on tape or something.

      Updating servers can by experience be more annoying though due to shitty applications that need manual intervention.
      But clients are no problem.

      P.S While not relevant to home users, windows nowadays be fully patched without rebooting for 2 out of 3 updates. You do have to pay for it with extra licenses though. I assume Linux also can be hot patched in a similar way (but maybe for free?) but normally it’s not.