The Department of Homeland Security is expanding its efforts to identify Americans who oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement by sending tech companies legal requests for the names, email addresses, telephone numbers and other identifying data behind social media accounts that track or criticize the agency.

In recent months, Google, Reddit, Discord and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, have received hundreds of administrative subpoenas from DHS, according to four government officials and tech employees privy to the requests. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Google, Meta and Reddit complied with some of the requests, the government officials said. In the subpoenas, the department asked the companies for identifying details of accounts that do not have a real person’s name attached and that have criticized ICE or pointed to the locations of ICE agents. The New York Times saw two subpoenas that were sent to Meta over the past six months.

The tech companies, which can choose whether or not to provide the information, have said they review government requests before complying. Some of the companies notified the people whom the government had requested data on and gave them 10 to 14 days to fight the subpoena in court.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    You should know that any emails older than 180 days are considered ‘abandoned’ and now only require an administrative subpoena to access and not a judicial warrant.

    Think your e-mails are protected by the 4th amendment? Sure, they are… but the definition of what ‘your e-mails’ is has been adjusted so the 4th amendment only effectively protects you for 6 months.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        http://andywibbels.com/privacy-email-cloud/

        Back when email was new, server storage was tiny and you downloaded your emails frequently. That’s when this law was passed.

        Nowadays with gmail etc… no one downloads their emails. They stay on the server forever, and government agencies are free to take them without a warrant.

        • vortic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          How have I never heard of this? In the digital age the 4th amendment really means nothing…

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R41733

          Section 2702 authorizes voluntary disclosure. Section 2703 speaks to the circumstances under which ECS and RCS providers may be required to disclose communications content and related records. Section 2703 distinguishes between recent communications and those that have been in electronic storage for more than 180 days. The section insists that government entities resort to a search warrant to compel providers to supply the content of wire or electronic communications held in electronic storage for less than 180 days. It permits them to use a warrant, subpoena, or a court order authorized in subsection 2703(d) to force content disclosure with respect to communications held for more than 180 days.

          A subsection 2703(d) court order may be issued by a federal magistrate or by a judge qualified to issue an order under Title III.220 It need not be issued in the district in which the provider is located.

          The person whose communication is disclosed is entitled to notice, unless the court authorizes delayed notification because contemporaneous notice might have an adverse impact. Government supervisory officials may certify the need for delayed notification in the case of a subpoena. Traditional exigent circumstances and a final general inconvenience justification form the grounds for delayed notification in either case:

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    16 hours ago

    And the corpos will give it willingly. Good luck getting the same information from most Fediverse instances.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If the instance is in the same country, a government can much more effectively exercise leverage against some guy running a server than a publicly traded corporation with lawyers on retainer.

      If it’s not the same country maybe easier just to ignore.

      The best case in terms of privacy is just not collecting data. Something like mullvad vpn where they don’t keep the sort of records that governments ask for.

      Unfortunately anti spam measures often involve collecting identifying information (like email addresses).