Hey all -

Just curious if anyone has seen a notice related to the news below. Reporting says hundreds sent out and that in most cases the tech companies have to notify the person and give time to contest it. So it would be good to get a clear example of these admin subpoena notices so we can all be on the lookout:

https://www.rawstory.com/ice-2675268854/

Or maybe this is some huge bullshit scare tactic.

Thank you!

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    So you use cash to get a burner phone for any online purchases or sites which need them?

    Why would I need a phone for that? I just told you I use a virtual CC.

    You only carry the burner when entering large corporate store chains which are fingerprinting the devices inside?

    I use GrapheneOS, which has mitigations for that sort of tracking. But Meta isn’t tracking me at the grocery store, regardless.

    You magically know every single big techs obfuscated domains for tracking cookies and block them the moment they are registered?

    I don’t allow access to any cookies. As I already said, I use an ad-blocker, of course, that tracks, updates, and blocks thousands of tracking domains.

    I think you are extremely naive about how easy it is to tie this information together by a databroker

    I think you know absolutely nothing about me, what I know, and what my data protection practices are.

    Sure meta may be blocked direct access on your network but they are buying that information from another data broker and tieing directly to you based on the contact information thats been gleemed from others who shared contact information with a meta product.

    I don’t think you understand. Even if someone sends Meta my phone number, they cannot associate my phone number to any other online activity because that would ALSO require my phone number, which they do not have, because I do not give it to them. Also gleaned* and tying*.