I use it because it has a built in adblocker, and well it just works.

There is some crypto bullfuck and AI shit you can easily opt out off, and some talk about some CEO making homophobic comments.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Also, in addition to what others said, Brave has been involved in some shady stuff like ad substitution/injection. See:

    https://thelibre.news/no-really-dont-use-brave/

    Similarly enough, Brendan Eich’s feed also contains some worrying content, in my opinion. Ranging from, again, retweeting right-wing activists, to weird Republican propaganda. He claims to be independent and not a Republican, but this does not make me any less worried about the type of ideas he follows.

    But yeah, if you are a big fan of AI and crypto, and are okay with having advertisements in the user interface out of the box, are okay with past attempts to steal money from websites and collect donations towards people who wouldn’t necessarily even receive it, plus you can put up with occasional privacy mistakes… use Brave!

  • xep@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Besides all the reasons everyone else has already provided in this thread, a browser containing as you so colourfully put it “crypto bullfuck and AI shit” isn’t something I want to use.

  • KaChilde@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There is some crypto bullfuck and AI shit you can easily opt out off, and some talk about some CEO making homophobic comments.

    I feel like you know the reasons already then.

    If having to install an adblocker is the biggest hurdle that means you are willing to put up with the rest of the BS, that’s your choice.

    I’d rather take 40 seconds to install a adblocker on a different browser and not support shit CEOs or software that comes loaded with crypto AI shit, but that’s just me.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Why use Brave when you can use Helium or Cromite?

    Helium has full (not lite) ublock origin built in, and no junk. That’s the gold standard of Adblock.

    Cromite has rather obsessive antifingerprinting, making it extremely difficult to track you compared to Brave.


    Basically, people use Brave because it’s got SEO; it’s the first result when people type in “Adblock browser” unfortunately.

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because crypto bro behaviour and I can install ublock in my firefox browser in both android and desktop.

    What makes/does Brave better?

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      All those browser extensions you need to make Firefox private ends up fingerprinting you. Brave has all of that by default, so sites of sites can’t easily differentiate you from other Brave users.

      Also, Firefox still doesn’t have tab groups on mobile. Chromium has had that feature for years and Firefox hasn’t bothered to keep up at all. That’s a non-starter for me

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Then switch to a Firefox fork that’s built for security rather than a Slop Browser built on data mining you (that’s all the built-in AI is) and that’s supporting crypto shit and has a bigoted CEO

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re forgetting the major point that Firefox still doesn’t have tab groups on mobile. That’s a complete dealbreaker. If they can’t be bothered to do that I would honestly be better off running Tor

          • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Tried to see if there’s a browser extension for that?

            Also, this really feels like the one meme from community.

            You’re the blonde girl right now

            I can excuse homophobia, crypto, and AI slop, but I draw the line at not having tab groups

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Have you not been paying attention to Mozilla lately? They’re barely any better on this.

              And on the racism point, we’re talking about an internet browser. If you’re going that far you’d have to throw out the Call of Cthulu rpg because Lovecraft was a racist or stop driving cars because Henry Ford was a Nazi.

              We’re comparing 2 different browsers, and the one everyone is recommending here (Firefox) is filling itself with AI and ads just like the one you’re all bashing. The only difference is one has a feature that I can’t do without, and Mozilla has been completely dropping the ball for years at catching up.

              Get your red herring bullshit out of here.

              And FYI, don’t bother responding. You’re clearly not arguing in good faith and you’re not worth wasting any more time on

              • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Then just use a fork.

                May as well cause Lovecraft

                No, cause he’s long dead, idiot. The homophobic asshole CEO is still alive

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Fingerprinting

        Not important to me. But understandable

        tab groups

        I actively disable that on everything I use it with (even in the about:config flag)

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why would you want tab groups on mobile? There is no real estate available to bother.

        Also, on mobile, Firefox focus is the best general purpose browser when you are just looking up things. Adblock is built in, all cookies are dropped on close.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For me it boils down to it pretending to be different from Chrome while using the same rendering engine, thus keeping more power at Google.

    As someone who lived through the time when IE was dominant and seeing the web stagnate until Mozilla released Firefox and began competing with new features and better speed, I never want to go back to a world with just one main rendering engine, we are sadly there again with Blink, but I am not going to support it.

  • nocturne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    @cannedtuna@lemmy.world is the author of everything that follows:

    This is a very well written an thorough article and I highly recommend reading it. If you don’t want to however, here is a summary of the key points:

    Edit: corrected a mistake noted below.

  • headset@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ahh yes. Brave the bloated browser with very dodgy behaviour. You get a chrome fork with crypto shit, leaky VPN, ridiculously bad search, and a full blown ad engine that hijacks your notifications and tracks you in an ‘anonymized’ way. FUCK.THAT.SHIT.

    • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not to be antagonistic, but

      • chrome fork - much of the browser world is this
      • crypto shit - opt in not mandatory
      • leaky VPN - opt in not mandatory
      • bad search - opt in not mandatory
      • ad engine - opt in not mandatory

      So, basically, it’s a chrome fork, and some people prefer chrome based browsers, so it’s purely preference?

      • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You know what’s better than that?

        The browser world that’s not a chrome fork, and not full of crypto and AI SHIT, and without a bigoted CEO

        Waterfox, Librewolf, Ironfox, Fennec, Ladybird, etc

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The main issues a lot of the FF purists on this site take with Brave is-

        1. its a chrome fork, which is a hard stop for them, and thats a good enough reason alone to avoid a product given how anti-corporate and anti-google the residents of this site are.

        2. the systems in the opt-in list are still part of the application. There is an anxiety that the developer may decide at a future time that those features are not opt-in/enabled by default after an update.

        So the natural response is to advocate for browsers that simply do not have those features and are open-source so that users can verify rather than trust the dev team to not put features like that in the product. Or rigoursly vet every update installed on your system to prevent that stuff from being installrd in an update, which is not viable for most people… (Run apt update/upgrade and manually approve every package change, we will see you in a few days).