• tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    When I turned it off the translation thingy went away, so I’m not sure if it was AI all along and they were lying about it or not. Just as well, there’s an extension that works fine and it doesn’t reload the page every time I toggled it like the built in one did.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The translation is technically AI, but it’s a distant cousin to the LLMs and image generators that have repulsed so many people. (The term AI is such a broad and vague umbrella that Netflix recommendations count as AI.) And, even more notably, this is before Mozilla started marketing things as AI.

      It was also a joint non-profit venture with a university, rather than today’s weird gimmicks or for-profit partnerships.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s less a vague umbrella and more an academic category. It just feels odd to call it vague in the same way you wouldn’t call “chemistry” vague, despite it having applications ranging from hand soap to toxic waste.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          In this case, the vagueness of the term AI is abused by its fans. “Aha, you claim to hate AI, and yet…” they say. They should know better.

          “Chemicals” is actually a great example. If someone said “Chemicals are coming out of that factory”, you’d rightfully cringe if a factory manager said “well actually soap is made of chemicals too”