Midwives have been told about the benefits of “close relative marriage” in training documents that minimise the risks to couples’ children.

The documents claim “85 to 90 per cent of cousin couples do not have affected children” and warn staff that “close relative marriage is often stigmatised in England”, adding claims that “the associated genetic risks have been exaggerated”.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It looks as though the goal was to encourage midwives not to stigmatise people for marrying their first cousins. That seems a good policy when they’re delivering healthcare services. But the way the numbers were presented made things appear worse than they are.

    I indulge in some risky behaviors (martial arts, skiing, cycling). I don’t want lectures about the risks of those, either. If I break a bone, I want it treated, and if the NHS takes a view on the activity that caused it, I’ll want to hear it later from my GP, and definitely not at the time I’m seeking treatment.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Did you read the article?

      ‘Benefits of cousin marriages’

      The NHS guidance, meanwhile, goes on to describe the benefits of cousin marriages.

      The papers explain how “marriage within the family can provide financial and social security at the individual, family and wider kinship levels”.

      If that’s not extolling the virtues of impregnanting your cousins, I don’t know what it is.