Why was chat control allowed to be presented again in the first place.
this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.
greedy corps going against law as usual.
No, not really. It’s because they retracted the proposal before going to vote, because they knew it wouldnt pass after Germany publicly said they would vote against.
Then they changed some stuff and send it again, which is now rejected as it seems.
Now they need to wait, but they didnt before.
So this war is far from an end huh?
They won’t stop pushing until they get it
Who are they?
The Commission probably since they’re the only entity who can propose law
Why do we have to keep fighting our own government for our rights? Why can’t our government just represent us?
Governments don’t represent the common people anymore.
We should topple the EU then tbh
Because unfortunately our rights are opposed to the will of capital and they serve capital first and foremost
Why can’t they vote on a ban to do any chat control bills? Stop this nonsense from happening again.
Will they just revote again then until it passes?
hopefully no. but we are still in danger
deleted by creator
BY ONE FUCKING VOTE!
https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574
Vote out every single fucker who is trying to limit our freedoms!
i don’t understand, was EPP for or against the extension ? Cause my understanding was that they asked to have a second vote even if the first one already rejected the extension.
as regards the extension of its period of application
does it mean that this vote was only about the extension of the regulation that allowed voluntary participation in scanning for chat providers?
honestly, that’s the lesser of the worries, we know facebook and fo are scanning all messages going through them no matter what
also, I was surprised that in my conservative country no MEP voted with acceptance. but maybe it’s because the proposal included adding clauses like this?
(v) not applied to interpersonal communications to which end-to-end encryption is, has been or will be applied;
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2026-0070_EN.html
That sounds kinda reasonable then. If the company has access to the chat logs in plain text, they should probably be scanning it for CSAM. Though the use of AI to identify it is concerning, given the low accuracy. And I guess there’s also the risk of communications with someone’s doctor being flagged.
On reflection it’s still a dumb law.
Thats actually insane in itself that it got that close. Next time they will succeed. :/
People are so stupid to support this. They dont seem to understand that its never about protecting anyone and its always about building dystopia.
Can it just fuck off for good this time?
it’s indicative of the system we’re in. our oligarchs have enough money to pay people to push for this in perpetuity while the rest of us are forced to give up some degree of our lives to fight it off on a field of battles that’s tilted towards money; they will win eventually unless the system itself is changed.
PLEASE
We should go to war against corpocracy, until all corporations are bankrupt.
EVERY. DAMN. ONE.
Good, but pretty meaningless overall while they still allow lobbying to take place.
They pretend to care that lobbying means corruption from corporate interests, but doing anything meaningful to stop lobbying entirely and punish anyone still doing it would be “authoritarian communism” now, wouldn’t it?
Where can I see who voted for and against? I want to know if I need to change who I vote for next EU election.
