• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Brakes on airplanes are used infrequently (though when they’re used, they’re safety-critical) so the usage pattern is very different than for cars.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That’s the real difference to me, maintenance. Planes have a strict schedule of inspection and replacement. Moms minivan last saw an oil change before the kids made it to middle school. There’s going to be some failures.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I mean, airplane brakes probably have about a 3% duty cycle (the percentage of time they’re in use), so they’re generally idle. For city driving, car brakes probably have about a 25% duty cycle.

        If those numbers are close to accurate, that means planes are using their brakes about 10x less than cars.

        BTW, I didn’t pull those plane numbers directly out of my ass, but they’re definitely a rough estimate. I’m figuring about 5 minutes of breaking time per flight, counting landing and during the taxi to and from the runway. And I’m assuming a 2.5 hour flight, figuring that could be close to an average flight time.

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I don’t think taxi and landing wear the brakes evenly. Landing must be something like 99% of the brake wear in <30 seconds of braking it takes for the plane to stop.