• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The way to fix this is to make the entirety of the school experience the same. Not by going cheap. But by giving more money to poorer schools to subsidize education so it’s up to the exact same standard across the board. Schools being paid for by local taxes is part of the problem here. It will not get better if we keep trying to fix it at the local level. These flock cameras are just the latest in an ill advised attempt to fix a problem the wrong way when fixing it the right way could cost much much less.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      But if poor people were smart, how could we continue to fleece them? It’s no longer profitable if even a fraction of them wise up!!

      /s

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even in states where schools are funded from education slush funds which are supposed to distribute funding equally it doesn’t work well. Well-off areas get better funding, poor areas get less. Some states even do it by county, so if people live in a rural county with no industry or population to tax the schools get very little money.

      Yeah, making it so things are more equitably distributed would be great, including higher teacher pay, lower administrative costs (like each district having its own admin and pay structure is ridiculous), etc.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The way to fix this is to make the entirety of the school experience the same. Not by going cheap. But by giving more money to poorer schools to subsidize education so it’s up to the exact same standard across the board.

      Where are you proposing the tax money come from for this? While there are certainly areas of poverty that lack funds, I’m not even sure that’s the majority of the lack of funds. Another is today’s senior citizens that were fine with their children’s education being subsidize by yesterday’s senior citizens and the childless tax payments, but as soon as their children are grown they vote down any tax increases to fund schools.

      Another point: I know a number of families that have intentionally moved out of good school, well funded, districts seeking lower taxes, and hence, worse funded schools. They would fight you on getting better funding even for their own schools if it meant the necessary tax increases. Teachers don’t, and shouldn’t work for free.

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        something something tAx MoNeY

        Idk maybe tax the fucking billionaires? Maybe instead of useless foreign wars spend it on schools? Tax the NFL? I’m just spit balling.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          They seem to think that what I mean is that we shouldn’t use tax money at all. No. I’m happy to pay for the same education for all children. A standardized education.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          something something tAx MoNeY

          Nice fake quote

          Idk maybe tax the fucking billionaires? Maybe instead of useless foreign wars spend it on schools? Tax the NFL? I’m just spit balling.

          Get out of here with that lazy answer. Saying [paraphrased] “Have someone else pay for it somehow” is the most throwaway answer to any cited problem. If you want to contribute to the conversation looking for a solution, then contribute. What you posted here isn’t a useful or meaningful contribution.

          I’m not opposed to taxing fucking billionaires, but how are you proposing? Increase on capital gains taxes? Higher taxes on non-resident properties? Wealth tax on unrealized gains? That’s a great conversation to have, but its pretty far away from school spending which is what we’re talking about here.

          I’m not opposed to lowering defense spending, but in the USA you might as well try to boil the ocean than try to reform the Military Industrial Complex today. Short of revolution, that’s not happening in our lifetime. If we have revolution, school taxation will be the last of our worries.

          • Bizzle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m glad you asked, here is my proposal.

            1. Execute Elon Musk and nationalize his wealth. This puts the fear into the rest of those scumbags, keep them on their toes.
            2. Time to raise the graduated tax brackets, something like 90% on income above $5 million. I just made up that number but I’m not a policy analyst, just a humble douchebag.
            3. Double the capital gains tax.
            4. 15% on unrealized gains above some threshold.
            5. Incredibly high tax on properties that are not owner occupied, I have a personal vendetta against landlords so fuck em.

            At any rate I’m still being more helpful than your “can’t afford it” rhetoric.