I don’t get it with the body either. No we are not insane as a species and if only because insanity is defined on what we as collective see as normal. But what is “deep history”? And people don’t get send to a doctor just because they believe in fairytales, at least where I live.
Humans seem to have an inert need to have answers and guessing one seems to be better than “I don’t know” for many.
I have my issues with proton because of its CEO and some weird decisions for their product lone and don’t use them at all. I.e. I won’t defend this company.
Such a claim without source and explanation or interpretation of assumed implications are pure fear mongering.
Because of this: my advice is to decouple your privacy concerns and thoughts from politics in the first degree (rhetoric and hearsay). Base it ok policies, observable behavior, audits, laws and so on…your example: exit nodes for VPNs don’t have an impact on security at all in neither direction. Hosting infrastructure there would (i.e. it would increase potential access and put the infrastructure under additional legal requirements).
Which are all of them who claim to hear a difference.
Joke’s on you, it was my keyboard that had connection issues! Wait, no. That joke was on me.
Agreed - and none of them are a catch-all answer suited for everyone from my point of view.
I full heartily disagree because MacBooks are a trap: While I agree with you in terms of production quality it’s a point of no return for a lot of use cases which rarely makes it the best option in my opinion.
It’s basically eliminating too many options down the road for it to be a good recommendation for most people for me. There are exceptions of course but i couldn’t call it “best” with good conscience.
Haha that was an auto correct fuck up - I agree with you!
It was supposed to be “are preferable” - that’s what I meant with the first sentence: There must still be effective encryption in the wild if some… elements fight so hard to kill it.
You realize they"trying to destroy" implies existence?
It’s not " good vs bad" for me, it’s a “better vs worse”. And for them: yes, European date centers as few are preferable at this point in time from my current knowledge.
Edit: Auto correct fuckup.
Then there would still be the possibility for someone to take off the glasses.
Or invent spectrometers.
Or make others curious.
I’d claim that our issue is too much belief and not a lack thereof. Beliefs remove the potential for excourse y for discussions and for admission of being wrong. Believing is the act of removing an item from analysis, from critique and in its final form from thinking about it.
Perhaps I’m misunderstanding you - if that’s the case please apologize.