If they weren’t using LLMs to code, I’d mostly agree with that. But projects that put effort into integrating LLMs likely use them as well (as is the case here).

How about one that doesn’t use LLMs to code?

Goddamnit. I hope someone forks 2.20.

https://sciactive.com/human-contribution-policy/

I really like having the disclosure comment pinned for a more nuanced explanation of what, if any, AI went into a project or post. I think just a tag can’t capture the levels of AI use.

I’m personally a never-genAI, but, unless we go No AI as a community, I don’t think it makes sense to group all projects that touch AI for documentation with all that use it for testing with all that completely let the AI generate all their code, etc. And I don’t think setting a threshold for which get tagged makes sense either. Basically, a tag is misleading no matter how it’s implemented.

I am Groot.

Just FYI, Homepage has ping functionality to check if your services are up. siteMonitor