

Unfortunately, if can only run the personal destiny of the user, as it is divinely inspired. /s


Unfortunately, if can only run the personal destiny of the user, as it is divinely inspired. /s


I regret to inform you that TempleOS runs your destiny just fine.


Oh…that’s a relief…😭


Isn’t that illegal under the Outer Space Treaty of 1967?


I use Tailscale, and it has been flawless for me. I use Nginx on a VPS to expose some services, and then keep the rest behind the Tailscale network so only I can access them.
It’s been so perfect that I can’t imagine doing it any other way for my needs.


You can let the whole world know that it is 3.2 miles to boonhet’s house. Party time! /s


Pro tip—there is a docker container that simulates windows with Backblaze in it so you can use the unlimited plan in Linux.


I use Backblaze personal backup for $9 per month with unlimited storage. I’ve backed up many terabytes without an issue.


Cool in theory, poor in execution. I tried to follow the road down a residential street with a lot of trees, and it quickly lost track of the street and left me in a Jumanji jungle.


What’s up with your th’s?


It’s just like Microsoft to remove the one I might actually want out of those three. More pinball, less data collection!


I believe it’s due to kernel philosophy.
Linux and Mac are a monolithic kernel, which I understand to mean that the entire OS runs in kernel space to operate the compatible hardware. This has the advantage of making sure the OS is in the drivers seat for resource management, and no individual program is easily able to overload the system and create instability, but it may limit the power of some programs and delay compatability of new hardware and software.
Windows, on the other hand, is a hybrid kernel, which means some functions are managed in user space so that a program has more control over the hardware. This can be useful for pushing gaming to the limit or running experimental/custom programs, but it can lead to instability from resource hungry programs or security vulnerabilities from Trojan horses.
As for why their ISO is huge, I s’pose it’s due to all the extra crap they throw in there like AI, pinball, and data collection stuff.
Apologies if I got something fundamentally wrong—there are plenty of bigger nerds than me on here—but that’s my best attempt at explaining the difference as well as I know it.


Ok, let’s assume it is someone I know well.
Saying “I always remember the pretty ones” to someone you aren’t consensually pursuing a flirtatious relationship with gives leisure suit Larry vibes.
I suspect that you and I have different lives: in the type and number of people we meet, and in the number of locations we meet them.
That is usually the case with two different people, yes.
Are you saying you meet tons of people who you are supposed to remember but you keep forgetting them? And then that when you meet them again, the context is appropriate for a flirtatious sounding response even though you don’t even remember them?
I’m genuinely curious, how does this actually happen to you, and what is the context where it is an average occurrence?


Considering that this is probably a casual acquaintance since you don’t remember meeting them, those last two responses are straight up creepy.


In my opinion, they take the good parts of the Hitman mechanics and apply it to 007, while also giving you new abilities with the gadgets and some limitations on random violence since you are…you know…the good guy.
The story is a little mid, but they are clearly setting up a universe for more games and it ends with some good potential for future plots.


I liked it. It was no Hitman, but it scratched the itch and the extra constraints for being an honorable agent were cool.
What is stopping me from paying a homeless dude to help me set up my computer by using their face?