I swear to god this wasn’t me or any of my immediate family

Good enough for me, so I did it. Why do you post on the fediverse rather than somewhere like reddit or twitter? I’m not sure I get where you’re coming from.

Thanks, I think some of the nightmare front page queries will be a problem for this tool, but I can use some of the idioms for the rest

I left so much bait in this thread that everyone missed this :)

OK, I’m switching the guest posting feature off soon.

Thanks to everyone who tried it out. 10/10 responses, would break the fediverse with you all again.

Not any more :) I don’t know any of these people in real life, some people host instances for their real life friends and family, or long time online acquaintances, which would be acceptable to me.

It actually did happen in reality on Reddit, an admin called spez changed the content of a user post. I don’t know if there’s ever been a rogue admin on the Fediverse, there’s no way of knowing.

Bad Bot, AP means ActivityPub in this thread

Excellent 👍

How do you know if a random server implements a particular FEP?

Thanks, subscribed to activitypub.space. I’ll probably make a post about the guest posting trial in the General Discussion channel at some point, since people are talking about barriers to first use.

A personal reason is that your identity on the fediverse is defined by who owns your private key (used for cryptographically signing your posts), and your domain, anybody who owns these can impersonate you or modify your posts without your knowledge.

I control both now so I’m UNSPEZABLE.

Another thing that won’t scale is large personal blocklists, say you’re on an instance with a million people, each activity coming in has to be compared with a 1000 person blocklist, PER LOCAL USER

👑 looks great ! Do you have any example blogposts showing the diagram and latex equation feature? I haven’t seen anywhere else in the fediverse do this

💖

🚨🚨🚨 DEAR MR PTZIDENT, A SECOND GUEST SHITPOST HAS HIT THE FEDIVERSE 🚨🚨🚨

https://scrapetacular.ydns.eu/post/10127#10330

I think so? I guess a Like has to happen before an Unlike, would the collection have multiple possible activity types in it?

While I have your ear, I don’t know how yet but I’d like it to be easier for devs to collaborate over AP for anything not involving security.

Shit, that went well, I was expecting pushback. Should I make an issue for discussion, or is there one already. I don’t know if the object also needs an ID

Whoa senpai noticed me. There actually is a recursive query format in the latest sqlite for this exact situation, Postgres may have something similar, I just thought a list is fine for the web UI. I’ll have to benchmaxx and pick a strategy for the API.

I actually read that FEP. In my code that is too shameful to release yet, I look for an Object, then look for its Type, then figure out how to deserialize the rest of the object, but this object doesn’t have one. Would it be possible to do something like this:

{
  "object": {
    "type": "LikeCollection",
    "likes": [like1, like2, ..etc]
  }
}

Or is that weird. Spare a thought for those in less dynamic languages :D

Hopefully. Or it might actually evolve into something worse

THIS IS THE FUTURE FURRIES WANT https://evilmaid.net/blog/trusting-trust-fediverse/interactionPolicy-flow.png

🚨🚨🚨 WE HAVE OUR FIRST GUEST SHITPOSTER 🚨🚨🚨 WE HAVE OUR FIRST GUEST SHITPOSTER

https://scrapetacular.ydns.eu/post/10127#10243