But his comment is relevant the toppic.

Modern industrial famring utilizes forced insemination with a tool operated by a human.

A reasonable person could argue that it’s not sexual assault becuase the act was not for sextial gratification, but purely utilitarian in order to obtain a baby cow, disregarding the welfare of the cow.

In other words, whether an act is sexual assault or not depends on the intentions of the actor, regardless of the experience of the subject and physical nature of the act.

If you fill in “human” as your subject in the above formula, a reasonable person could conclude that the experience of the subject does, infact, matter.

The dildo of an unintended consequences is approaching.

Bullies will start blowing vape smoke on other kid’s desks to get them in trouble. And someone will eventual create a smoke-box class room to get the screen to light up with alerts.

Then what? You need to cross reference the alerts with a video feed or snapshots.

Then some genius will figure that using AI to analyze all of the data is easier than manually doing so.