• 2 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 13 days ago
cake
Cake day: September 10th, 2026

help-circle





  • No. Possibly because I have never really tried to, after realizing that:

    1. People entering said debates are mostly just there to win an argument.
    2. I am under no obligation to convince them that their beliefs are utterly stupid

    Those who hold stupid positions aren’t really the ones with a mind open enough to the position that they might in fact be in the wrong. Plus, I don’t have the capacity for bullshit that such an endeavor requires.

    I have long since concluded that people will not only hold stupid beliefs, but desperately cling to them and consider me not having the fortitude to put up with all the fallacies that follows as a sign that they’re right.

    I don’t really have an audience, and I therefore don’t feel like entering a debate, because debates to me seem mostly performative in an effort to gather soundbites and/or screenshots.

    I’m sure you (yes, you reading this) have plenty of positions I find utterly idiotic, but I frankly don’t think I’m the one who will be able to convince you. I can’t educate the world, the world needs to converge on that on its own.
















  • I don’t think horses are common enough to be a common post-apocalyptic beast of burden. Besides, the apocalypse itself would probably cause food scarcity, and feeding the horse would most likely instead turn into eating the horse.

    But yes, some elite factions m8ght use them for riding, but I suspect it would be very rare. I think The Postman, despite being an awful movie, has elements of realism, in that Holnists (or whatever the anti-Kevin faction was called) would usetheir power to gain access to horses. Or maybe their founder owned a horse ranch during the apocalypse and that’s why they’re powerful.