• LordXDnl@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I mean when you make it as arbitrary as possible. The universe is terminally unstable and will be completely destroyed. Bit of a nonsensical headline without timelines.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      23 hours ago

      FTA:

      The estimated lifespan of the outer solar system has been downgraded from 100 billion years to just a few billion years, according to a study that probed “terminal instability” during the Sun’s death.

      • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        22 hours ago

        FTA:

        “Newton’s envisioned instability is real after all,” the team. “He was mistaken only about the perpetrator.”

        The news isn’t that the solar system will eventually collapse (the concept of entropy isn’t new) but that the mass loss is not predictable and smooth and the impact of the irregular mass loss fucks with their orbit:

        The recently measured white dwarf recoil demands asymmetric mass loss that is most readily attributed to discrete, independently directed ejections that impulsively perturb stellar motion.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        People are acting like it’s not a problem, but if we have just one more downgrade of that magnitude, we’ll be in big trouble

          • bampop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Nope. One more downgrade like that and the collapse of the solar system will be 88 billion years in the past. It’ll collapse before it even formed, and none of this mess will have happened in the first place. Come to think of it, that doesn’t sound so bad. Since it precedes the big bang, that might help with damage limitation.

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yeah, at that magnitude loss one more and we’d only have tens of millions of years left.

    • Klear@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Bit of a nonsensical headline if you refuse to read the article smh by head

      • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If an article’s title doesn’t make sense until after you read the article, then the title is meant to ensnare rather than inform. Aka click bait.