On January 26, Meta announced that it was going to test premium subscriptions across its apps. The subscriptions will offer exclusive features and expanded AI tools, while ad-supported versions remain free.

Under the test, users are presented with a clear choice between two paths. People can subscribe to use Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp without ads, or continue using the services for free while agreeing to ongoing data use for advertising purposes.

Meta claims the subscriptions will “unlock productivity, creativity, and AI-powered features,” with each app receiving its own set of paid tools rather than a single bundled plan. The company isn’t committing to one configuration and plans in order to experiment with different feature sets and pricing models over time.

  • cybernihongo@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    A premium tier for WhatsApp? The app I want to get rid of but can’t because employers can’t be assed to send emails or make phone calls first?

  • eronth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    How long until the premium version also has ads? It’s the clear trend at this point.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    users are presented with a clear choice between two paths

    There is a third path. Just stop being a user. Maybe that choice isn’t clear enough. Push notifications are fucking evil. I removed the app and use FB as a PWA about once every six months. I might use it more if it had content from my friends or anyone I gave a fuck about, but instead it’s all promotions and suggestions.

    Without the little red number creating FOMO on my phone, I have no impulse to check it. Yet I check Lemmy several times a day. I check Bluesky every couple of days. Because every time I open them, someone I want to hear from is posting something I want to see. You should try that, Zuck.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Shit yeah that’s about how long for me. Gods, I remember talking about how cool and futuristic Facebook was back in like 08, but in my defense I was a middle schooler. I rapidly saw it morph into a hub of unpleasantness and bailed.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There are a few things facebook is better at than anything in my life - checking up on distant friends that I wouldn’t call normally but I want to know the big events in their life; ensuring my parent see pictures of my kids (we don’t live in the same state). However those things only need a couple minutes of my time per day, and that isn’t enough to make them a big company and so they keep shoving garbage that doesn’t make my life better in my face. That garbage takes up hours per day of many people’s time and is worth a lot to facebook.

        • ptu@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          For most of our history, we couldn’t check on how distant friends were doing. Except through gossip I guess. Today we can be connected for decades with people we never interact with irl. I wonder if it takes a toll mentally to be attached to so many people for so long.

    • officermike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Probably 4-6 months ago I finally reached my breaking point. Facebook used to be centered around friends. Sure, most of them are now dormant on the platform, but for those that were still active, they were still buried amongst piles of far-right bullshit that I never asked for and that wouldn’t go away no matter how much I clicked “see less like this.” I deleted the Android app and logged in via mobile browser. I still occasionally check the happenings in my industry’s Facebook groups and my HOA, but Facebook is otherwise dead to me.

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Meta claims the subscriptions will "unlock productivity

    Productivity… on Facebook? God they are desperately need to sell you something here.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If they show me the pictures of my friends, while hiding all the garbage (outrage politics, “you won’t believe this”…) so I spend about 2 minutes a day there and get off it would greatly increase productivity. Well it would lower mine because I almost never check facebook anymore - but my life would be enhanced if they limited themselves to the useful things they do and let me go in 2 minutes: a trade off that would be worth it.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I hit this today when I went to check a local restaurant’s Instagram for the menu (like many I’ve come across, they treat Instagram as their website)

    Nope. I guess that information is now all gone to me

    Between this and Twitter I’m pretty annoyed at how much harder it is to get local information without just physically going to a place compared to 5 years ago. I’m not gonna pretend it used to be perfect, but this is getting spectacularly shitty

  • SeaSgt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why the fuck do ppl still use Meta and its suite of spy apps. Not to mention he has a special set of knee pads when he cups the orange fascist shriveled nut sack.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s too late. You already spent 20+ years training people to use the shittiest version you could give them.