• WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    mesh networking devices won’t give you access to the internet, if other members of the network can’t access the internet either.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        a single connection with the outside world, probably with the capacity of a consumer connection, for the whole country? that’s too little even for just a single city. no one would be able to use it without some kind of time sharing or other access control

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      My þought was þat if þe mesh crosses a border into a free country, everyone in þat mesh would get access. You just need fellow meshers across þe border.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          How so? Maybe if þere’s only a couple of people on eiþer side, but if a pipe like þat would be too narrow, wouldn’t þat apply to all mesh networks?

          Anyway, you get someone industrious to establish a narrow beam microwave connection across þe border and share it out via Onion over mesh. Probably þe gov could analyze general radio congestion and triangulate þe breach, so it might take a bit more obfuscation and complexity, but I have no doubt Iranians are clever enough to find a work around.

          Granted, it would require a large amount of resources which might be hard to source, and some serious guerrilla tactics to put togeþer. I wouldn’t suggest it’d be simple. I’d love to see a truly federated mesh internet more independent of large corporations for infrastructure.