• cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh, people didn’t like the idea of giving their ID to third parties? Let’s move up to irreplaceable body parts. Next step: your fucking blood. Good luck declaring that one stolen when the database inevitably leaks.

    • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      That reminds me of my ex, she was willing to give her physical address and phone number to anyone who asked, but not her email address, because of security concerns.

  • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

    🤮

  • PerfectDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe it is finally time for open-source(ish) dating to make an impact!

    (It won’t. I tried it a couple years back and it is a ghost town!)

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s probably a Goldilocks zone thing where too few prevents it from working, and too many will inevitably be overrun by bots and scanners.

  • the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The writing on the wall says this will be required to access anything on the internet. I’ll go a step farther and say, DNA will be required to access the internet. Only once life would be impossible to live without access. Getting closer and closer.

  • D1re_W0lf@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

  • EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    All they had to do was improve their facial recognition to scan all photos. Scammers would use fake photos and put their real photo (ai edited slightly) as the their last photo. This allowed them to get verified, but still scam. They don’t need more biometrics. Other apps are doing fine without your iris scans.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah but then they wouldn’t get to collect people’s biometric data to sell to the highest bidder.

    • Tiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      From what I’ve read, the “dating” meat market apps are doing horrible. I doubt they want to invest in a sinking ship, at least more than they have to.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    In the context of online dating, I actually agree with implementing the same level of KYC checks that banks and credit card issuers have adopted. I also think the FTC needs to step in and break up the monopoly Match Group has created.

    All of these platforms are littered with fake profiles, scammers and foreign women searching for the means to a green card. It’s made them practically unusable.

  • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Haven’t used Tinder in a few years, but I guess I won’t be using it in the future. I’m not scanning my eye to use what is arguably the worst dating app.

    • leoj@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Could be unique like a fingerprint. Might be able to crosscheck this with other biometric data, like when a picture is taken at airports or border crossings.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those fast track lines at the airport I recently read somewhere is supplied by a private entity, which means all those face scans are just added into a database for future surveillance.

        • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You can say no to the face scan at those. The TSA agents don’t get paid enough to try to convince you otherwise and just say “okay.” The amount of people just willingly scanning their faces for whatever nefarious bullshit they want to scan faces for does not surprise me, but does cause me dismay

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      It was a spam bot swarm a decade ago.

      I checked again around 2023, then it was full of human backed fake profiles that pushed cryptocoin scams. It’s called pig butchering.

      Today I assume it’s still pog butchering but backed by LLMs instead of people.