• Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It would be based off objectivity, not belief.

    Whether someone thinks it’s a lie or not doesn’t matter. Although you do bring up a good point. Maybe having an additional category “mistaken lies” or something would help. It would also help decipher how often the person fact checks lol

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      there really is not objectivity with white grey black lies because everyone has different lines. Its why you even need the gray area.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        gray in the case of lies doesn’t mean gray areas, a grey lie when identifying lies actually means that the lie benefits both parties without causing harm to either side. A white lie is a lie that benefits the other party at the cost of the liar, a black lie only helps the liar at the cost of the other party, and a red lie hurts both the liar and the other party.

        I would say that type of system could only be objective, while the intent does matter as well, I believe a lie that harms the other side, even when you meant otherwise would be either a red or a black lie, since it harms the other it can’t be gray or white.