• late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3時間前

    Becoming a billionaire really does seem to get to people’s heads, the younger the billionaire the worse.

    Zuck is being completely reckless, burning through hundreds of billions of dollars hopping on every futuristic idea, and doesn’t listen to anyone’s fair criticism anymore.

    He probably even thinks he is some great visionary and everyone else is holding him back, and that’s why they work for him, not the opposite.

    In a sane socioeconomic system we wouldn’t people get this rich and powerful for their own good, especially young people.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6時間前

    At least he didn’t have to spend all that money on higher salaries. How you boys liking the rocket game? I’m thinking about blowing a few dozen billion on that, just as a hobby. Not trying to make money off it.

    • cmbabul@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5時間前

      Which does piss me off, BUT the world would be better if we took Meta, Reddit, Twitter, and all the other social media giants and gave them the Ole Yeller treatment

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    11時間前

    Outside of Facebook what has he been responsible for that didn’t blow up in his face? The only other things Meta has that aren’t thus far miserable failures are Instagram and Whatsapp, both of which they bought.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      46分前

      And Google built a search engine. Everything else they’ve tried to build has failed, other than maybe Gmail which was just a Yahoo Mail / Hotmail clone. Everything else that has been successful has been an acquisition: Maps (Keyhole), YouTube, Android, Google Photos (Picasa), Doubleclick…

      We really need robust antitrust. How many of these acquisitions would be thriving companies in their own right, competing with the big tech giants if the tech giants hadn’t been able to absorb them.

      Google+ is an example of what happens when companies have to compete instead of acquiring other companies. Google poured billions into it and it flopped completely.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8時間前

      Tells you a lot about success and merit. He has absolutely no fucking clue what’s going to be successful and what won’t. He was just super lucky with Facebook.

      The reason he’s a billionaire is because the system is totally fucked up. He’s a bug, not a feature.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      12時間前

      It’s what happens when you own a controlling share of the company. You can freely run it into the ground.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10時間前

    I keep asking myself why he’s still there. Even Bezos retired at this point.

    • jrs100000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5時間前

      The only way to get him out of the CEO chair is for him to retire or die. He never gave up voting control during the IPO and controls more than 50% of the vote.

  • dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13時間前

    They are automatically putting ppls pictures in image to video ai without permission and advertising it back to them